Egg donor compensation to rise

19 October 2011 Last updated at 08:07 ET

By Jane Hughes Health correspondent, BBC News

Could higher payments raise donation rates?

The UK’s fertility watchdog has agreed to triple the compensation given to women who donate eggs to help infertile couples to have a child.

Donors currently receive up to £250 to cover expenses and lost earnings.

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has decided to pay a one-off fee of £750 per course of donation.

Experts believe this will encourage more women to donate, but critics warn it may create financial incentives for what can be a risky procedure.

The final decision on compensation was made at a meeting of the HFEA on Wednesday. It is also ruling on whether compensation for sperm donors should be increased.

There are currently long waits in the UK – sometimes five years or more – for couples seeking donor eggs.

In a significant number of cases they travel abroad for treatment, often to Spain or the United States, where payments are higher and more women volunteer.

Invasive process

But there can be risks involved with having treatment in countries where regulations are less stringent.

Egg donation is an invasive process, which involves daily hormone injections, scans every couple of days, and day surgery to recover the eggs.

Side-effects range from mood swings, bloating and pain, to rare but severe over-reactions to the hormones.

The HFEA says some women who donate eggs currently make a financial loss by doing so.

The National Gamete Donation Trust, which helps couples seeking egg or sperm donors, welcomed the change.

“A balance is being struck between recognising the wonderful gift of donation yet not affecting the purity of donors’ motives,” said Laura Witjens, chairwoman of the NGDT.

“Altruistic motives should remain at the core of donation, and payment should never facilitate coercion.”

But Olivia Montuschi of the Donor Conception Network, a self-help network of donors and families of children conceived by egg or sperm donation, said she was deeply disappointed by the HFEA decision.

“It will be something will come to regret,” she said. “The perception will be that are paying donors. £750 would make a huge difference to a ng woman.”

‘Commodity’

The British Fertility Society supports an increase in compensation payment, but said it was important to ensure that women continued to volunteer for altruistic reasons.

“The level of compensation should be raised so that it is commensurate with what a donor has to go through,” said BFS chair, Tony Rutherford.

But opponents worry about the impact of increased payments.

Dr David King, Director of Human Genetics Alert, said it will create a financial incentive for women.

“Ethically, it’s wrong to make part of the human body a commodity,” he said. “The body should not be part of commerce.”

Josephine Quintavalle, of Comment on Reproductive Ethics, said “Egg harvesting is an invasive and dangerous process and women should not be induced with ever larger sums of money to incur such risks.”

— ’re ’s , . : A ‘Malign Intellectual Subculture’ – George Monbiot Smears Chomsky, Herman, Peterson, Pilger And Media Lens.